Section 270A Income Tax Act | Penalty Undisclosed Income

Section 270A of the Income Tax Act was introduced through Finance Act 2016. Section 270A provides for Penalty for Under Reporting of Income. You should understand that, simply reporting wrong income does not attract penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act. This section has got much more importance due to the Demonetisation scheme introduced by the Central Government recently targeting the black money holders.

Even if a Assessee has not filed a Return of Income, any income identified will be as an Under Reported income and penalty under section 270A will be levied.

Section 270A of the Income Tax Act penalty

History of Section 271A

The Income-Tax Act has inserted sub-section (7) in section 271 to provide as ‘The provision of Section 271 shall not apply to and in relation to any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or after 01.04.2017.

Due to the insertion of the said sub-section in Section 271, the penalty leviable under section 271(1)(b) in respect of failure to comply with the notice under section 142(1) or Section 143(2) or failure to comply with direction issued under section 142(2A) has been merged under Section 272A(1).

Further, penalty for concealment of the particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income leviable under Section 271(1) (C) will now be levied under the newly inserted Section 270A w.e.f  01.04.2017.

The newly inserted Section 270A provides for levy of penalty in cases of under-reporting and misreporting of income instead of concealment of the particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.

Proviso of the said section says that “ the Assessing officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, during the course of any proceeding under this Act, direct that any person who has under-reported his income shall be liable to pay a penalty in addition to tax, if any, on the under – reported income.

Reasons for under-reporting of income: Section 270A

Where under – reported income is in consequence of misreporting of income – Section 270A r.w.s. 270A(9) : Penalty 200% of the amount of tax payable on under – reported income

In respect of under – reported income, the assessee offers an Explanation & the relevant Income Tax Authority ***  is satisfied with the same – Section 270A (6)(a) : Penalty  Nil

Where the method employed to determine under reported – income properly deduced there from – Section 270A (6) (b) : Penalty  Nil

Where under – reported income determined is based on any estimate by an assessee on his own, estimated  the lower amount of addition or disallowance on the same – Section 276A(6) (c) – Penalty  Nil

Where under – reported income is represented by any addition made in conformity with the arm’s length price determined by the Transfer Pricing officer – Section 270 A (6) (d): Penalty  Nil

Where under – reported income is due to amount of undisclosed income referred to in Section 271AAB i.e. Penalty where search has been initiated – Section 270A(6) (e): Penalty  Nil

Where under-reported income is for any other reason. Section 270 A (1) – Penalty 50% of the amount of tax payable on under – reported income.

Reasons for misreporting of income:  Penalty: 200% of the amount of tax payable on misreporting of income

  • Misrepresentation or suppression of facts;
  • Failure to record investments in the books of accounts;
  • Claim of expenditure not substantiated by any evidence;
  • Recording of any false entry in the books of account;
  • Failure to record any receipt in books of accounts having a bearing on total income; and
  • Failure to report any international transaction or any transaction deemed to be international transaction or any specified domestic transaction.

Salient Features of Section 270A

1.

Section 270A providing for “Penalty for under reporting & misreporting of income” was inserted by the Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f.  Assessment Year 2017-18

2.

Section 270A(1) provides that “The AO or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Pr. Commissioner or Commissioner May direct that any person who has under-reported his income shall be liable to pay a penalty in addition to tax, if any, on the under-reported income”.

3.

Position of penalty under section 270A is discretionary and not mandatory in view of the word “May” used in the said sub-section.

4.

Where no return is furnished, income is said to be under-reported if the income assessed exceeds the maximum income not chargeable to tax.

5.

The amount of under-reported income shall be, in a case where income has been assessed for the first time, if return has been furnished, the difference between the amount of income assessed and the amount of income determined.

6.

In a case where no return has been furnished, the amount of under-reported income shall be (I) the amount of income assessed, in the case of a company, firm or local authority; and (II) the difference between the amount of income assessed and the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, in a case not covered in item (I)

7.

In any other case, under-reported income shall be the difference between the amount of income reassessed or recomputed and the amount of income assessed, reassessed or recomputed in a preceding order.

8.

Where under-reported income is in consequence of misreporting, the penalty shall be equal to 200% of the amount of tax payable on under-reported income

9.

Where there is only under-reporting without mis-reporting, the penalty shall be 50% of amount of tax payable on under-reported income

10.

Levy of penalty is discretionary but amount of penalty is not discretionary.

11.

Concerned authorities may decide not to impose penalty. But if they decide to impose, then they must impose the mandatory quantum as per aforesaid Section.

Brief analysis on the basis of present legal provisions: Section 270A

Misreporting will not attract penalty under section 270A at 200%.

To attract the penalty at 200%, misreporting should result in assessed income being more than what is determined on processing under section 143(1)(a).

The Department may match cash deposits with returns filed for past assessment years up to and including AY 2016-17 in February 2017 itself and if it does not match, notices may be sent out.

In appropriate cases, surveys and raids may take place also. 2017-18. If that happens, assessee may not get a chance to say ‘As current year’s Income” in Tax Return of Assessment year 2017-18.

Further, Department will not accept a disproportionate compared to preceding year as current year’s income unless satisfactorily explained.

For e.g. if ‘X’ declares a total income of Rs.5 lakhs in preceding year and declares a huge amount of Rs. 50 Lakhs including a huge cash deposit of say Rs. 25 Lakhs, the Department is unlikely to accept the same as current year’s income.

Further, the Department may not wait till Tax Return of current year is filed and based on report by bank it may initiate survey or search.

Declaring past years’ income as current year’s income is making false statement in verification and would attract prosecution under section 277.

Disclosure of huge cash deposit as “Current Year’s Income” may result in investigations under VAT, Service Tax etc.

Provisions of “The Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 as amended by the 2016 Amendment Act” may be invoked.

Under the said Act, whoever is found guilty shall be punishable for rigorous imprisonment up to 7 years and fine up to 25% of fair market value of the property.

Benami property is liable to confiscation.

Conclusion

Section 270A is one of the important provisions in the entire Income Tax Act aimed at preventing black money in India. Income Tax Department has been using this provision effectively and filing cases on the Assessees who are not filing their Return of Income and paying taxes to the Indian Government.